Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
1.
Radiologia (Engl Ed) ; 66 Suppl 1: S24-S31, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642957

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There are no defined criteria for deciding to remove a non-functioning indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) when lung re-expansion on chest X-ray is incomplete. Chest computed tomography (chest CT) is usually used. The objective of this work is to validate the usefulness of chest ultrasound performed by a pulmonologist and by a radiologist compared to chest CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, descriptive, multidisciplinary and multicenter study including patients with malignant pleural effusion and non-functioning IPC without lung reexpansion. Decisions made on the basis of chest ultrasound performed by a pulmonologist, and performed by a radiologist, were compared with chest CT as the gold standard. RESULTS: 18 patients were analyzed, all of them underwent ultrasound by a pulmonologist and chest CT and in 11 of them also ultrasound by a radiologist. The ultrasound performed by the pulmonologist presents a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 66% in the decision of the correct removal of the IPC. The concordance of both ultrasounds (pulmonologist and radiologist) was 100%, with a kappa index of 1. The 4 discordant cases were those in which the IPC was not located on the ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic ultrasound performed by an expert pulmonologist is a valid and simple tool to determine spontaneous pleurodesis and remove a non-functioning IPC, which would make it possible to avoid chest CT in those cases in which lung reexpansion is observed with ultrasonography.


Assuntos
Derrame Pleural Maligno , Humanos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pleural Maligno/terapia , Derrame Pleural Maligno/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Cateterismo , Cateteres de Demora , Ultrassonografia
2.
Radiologia (Engl Ed) ; 66 Suppl 1: S3-S9, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mesothelioma is an infrequent neoplasm with a poor prognosis that is related to exposure to asbestos and whose peak incidence in Europe is estimated from 2020. Its diagnosis is complex; imaging techniques and the performance of invasive pleural techniques being essential for pathological confirmation. The different diagnostic yields of these invasive techniques are collected in the medical literature. The present work consisted of reviewing how the definitive diagnosis of mesothelioma cases in our centre was reached to check if there was concordance with the data in the bibliography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma in the period 2019-2021, analysing demographic data and exposure to asbestos, the semiology of the radiological findings and the invasive techniques performed to reach the diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-six mesothelioma cases were reviewed. 22 men and 4 women. Median age 74 years. 9 patients had a history of asbestos exposure. Moderate-severe pleural effusion was the most frequent radiological finding (23/26). The sensitivity of the invasive techniques was as follows: Cytology 13%, biopsy without image guidance 11%, image-guided biopsy 93%, surgical biopsy 67%. CONCLUSIONS: In our review, pleural biopsy performed with image guidance was the test that had the highest diagnostic yield, so it should be considered as the initial invasive test for the study of mesothelioma.


Assuntos
Amianto , Mesotelioma , Derrame Pleural , Neoplasias Pleurais , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Mesotelioma/etiologia , Neoplasias Pleurais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pleurais/etiologia , Amianto/efeitos adversos , Derrame Pleural/induzido quimicamente , Derrame Pleural/complicações , Derrame Pleural/patologia , Diagnóstico por Imagem
3.
Respirar (Ciudad Autón. B. Aires) ; 15(4): 279-284, Diciembre 2023.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1518697

RESUMO

Introducción: El biliotórax es una condición infrecuente definida por la presencia de bilis en el espacio pleural. Actualmente, hay alrededor de 70 casos descritos en la litera-tura. Sigue siendo relativamente desconocido, por lo tanto, poco sospechado. Esta entidad suele ser el resultado de una lesión iatrogénica, a menudo secundaria a cirugías o traumatismos del tracto biliar, que conduce a la formación de una fístula pleurobiliar.


Introduction: Bilothorax is a rare condition defined by the presence of bile in the pleural space. Currently, there are around 70 cases described in the literature. It remains relatively unknown and, therefore, little suspected. This entity is usually the result of an iatrogenic injury, often secondary to surgery or trauma to the biliary tract, leading to the formation of a pleurobiliary fistula


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Derrame Pleural/complicações , Bile , Empiema Pleural/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Sistema Biliar , Biópsia , Tomografia , Cavidade Pleural , Metástase Neoplásica/diagnóstico
4.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 161(10): 422-428, nov. 2023. ilus, tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-227672

RESUMO

Background and objectives The results of previous PET-CT studies are contradictory for discriminating malignant from benign pleural effusions. We purpose to develop a PET-CT score for differentiating between benign and malignant effusions. Patients and methods We conducted a prospective study of consecutive patients with pleural effusions undergoing PET-CT from October 2013 to October 2019 (referral cohort). PET-CT scan features evaluated using the SUV were: linear thickening; nodular thickening; nodules; masses; circumferential thickening; mediastinal and fissural pleural involvement; intrathoracic lymph nodes; pleural loculation; inflammatory consolidation; pleural calcification; cardiomegaly; pericardial effusion; bilateral effusion; lung mass; liver metastasis and other extra-pleural malignancy. The results were validated in an independent prospective cohort from November 2019 to June 2021. Results One hundred and ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the referral cohort (91 with malignant effusions and 108 benign). The most useful parameters for the development of a PET-CT score were: nodular pleural thickening, pleural nodules with SUV>7.5, lung mass or extra pleural malignancy (10 points each), mammary lymph node with SUV>4.5 (5 points) and cardiomegaly (−1 point). With a cut-off value of >9 points in the referral cohort, the score established the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion with sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 90.7%, positive predictive value 88.9%, negative predictive value 89.9%, positive likelihood ratio 7.81 and negative likelihood ratio 0.106. These results were validated in an independent prospective cohort of 75 patients. Conclusions PET-CT score was shown to provide relevant information for the identification of malignant pleural effusion (AU)


Antecedentes y objetivos Los estudios PET-TAC previos en el análisis del derrame pleural son contradictorios. Nuestro objetivo es desarrollar una puntuación mediante PET-TAC para diferenciar entre derrames benignos y malignos. Pacientes y métodos Estudio prospectivo en pacientes con derrame pleural a los que se realizó una PET-TAC desde octubre de 2013 hasta octubre de 2019 (cohorte de referencia). Los datos analizados fueron: engrosamiento lineal; engrosamiento nodular; nódulos; masas; engrosamiento circunferencial; afectación pleural mediastínica y cisural; ganglios linfáticos torácicos; loculación pleural; consolidación; calcificación pleural; cardiomegalia; derrame pericárdico; derrame bilateral; masa pulmonar; metástasis hepáticas y otras neoplasias malignas extrapleurales. Se calculó el SUV de todos estos parámetros. Los resultados se validaron en una cohorte independiente. Resultados Se incluyó a 199 pacientes en la cohorte de referencia (91 derrames malignos y 108 benignos). Los parámetros que mostraron más utilidad para discriminar ambos derrames y desarrollar una puntuación fueron: engrosamiento pleural nodular, nódulos pleurales con SUV > 7,5, masa pulmonar o malignidad extrapleural (10 puntos cada uno), ganglio en cadena mamaria con SUV > 4,5 (5 puntos) y cardiomegalia (–1 punto). Con un punto de corte > 9 en la cohorte de derivación, se estableció el diagnóstico de derrame pleural maligno con una sensibilidad del 87,9%, especificidad del 90,7%, valor predictivo positivo del 88,9%, valor predictivo negativo del 89,9% razón de verosimilitud positiva del 7,81 y razón de verosimilitud negativa del 0,106. Estos resultados fueron validados en una cohorte prospectiva independiente de 75 pacientes. Conclusiones Una puntuación basada en PET-TAC proporciona información relevante para el diagnóstico del derrame pleural maligno (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 161(10): 422-428, 2023 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The results of previous PET-CT studies are contradictory for discriminating malignant from benign pleural effusions. We purpose to develop a PET-CT score for differentiating between benign and malignant effusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of consecutive patients with pleural effusions undergoing PET-CT from October 2013 to October 2019 (referral cohort). PET-CT scan features evaluated using the SUV were: linear thickening; nodular thickening; nodules; masses; circumferential thickening; mediastinal and fissural pleural involvement; intrathoracic lymph nodes; pleural loculation; inflammatory consolidation; pleural calcification; cardiomegaly; pericardial effusion; bilateral effusion; lung mass; liver metastasis and other extra-pleural malignancy. The results were validated in an independent prospective cohort from November 2019 to June 2021. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the referral cohort (91 with malignant effusions and 108 benign). The most useful parameters for the development of a PET-CT score were: nodular pleural thickening, pleural nodules with SUV>7.5, lung mass or extra pleural malignancy (10 points each), mammary lymph node with SUV>4.5 (5 points) and cardiomegaly (-1 point). With a cut-off value of >9 points in the referral cohort, the score established the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion with sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 90.7%, positive predictive value 88.9%, negative predictive value 89.9%, positive likelihood ratio 7.81 and negative likelihood ratio 0.106. These results were validated in an independent prospective cohort of 75 patients. CONCLUSIONS: PET-CT score was shown to provide relevant information for the identification of malignant pleural effusion.


Assuntos
Derrame Pleural Maligno , Derrame Pleural , Humanos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pleural Maligno/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pleural/etiologia , Cardiomegalia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Cir. Esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 100(11): 673-683, nov. 2022. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-212469

RESUMO

Este artículo resume la guía clínica de diagnóstico y tratamiento del derrame pleural maligno (DPM) auspiciada por la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica (SECT). Se elaboraron 10 controversias clínicas bajo la metodología de preguntas PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) y la calidad de la evidencia y graduación de la fuerza de las recomendaciones se basó en el sistema Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). El análisis inmunocitoquímico y molecular del líquido pleural puede evitar procedimientos invasivos ulteriores con finalidad diagnóstica. Actualmente, el control definitivo del DPM se puede realizar indistintamente a través de una pleurodesis (talco poudrage o slurry) o de la inserción de un catéter pleural tunelizado (CPT). Es probable que la combinación de ambas técnicas (p.ej. toracoscopia con talco poudrage e inserción de un CPT, o instilación de talco slurry a través de un CPT) ocupe un lugar predominante en el manejo terapéutico futuro. (AU)


This article summarizes the clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) sponsored by the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT). Ten clinical controversies were elaborated under the methodology of PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions and the quality of the evidence and grading of the strength of the recommendations was based on the GRADE system. Immunocytochemical and molecular analyses of pleural fluid may avoid further invasive diagnostic procedures. Currently, the definitive control of MPE can be achieved either by pleurodesis (talc poudrage or slurry) or the insertion of a indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). It is likely that the combination of both techniques (i.e., thoracoscopy with talc poudrage and insertion of a IPC, or instillation of talc slurry through a IPC) will have a predominant role in the future therapeutic management. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Cirurgia Torácica , Derrame Pleural Maligno , Pleurodese , Espanha , Sociedades Científicas , Cateteres
7.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 159(5): 240-247, septiembre 2022. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-208980

RESUMO

El diagnóstico de mesotelioma pleural difuso requiere en la mayoría de los casos una biopsia pleural, realizada bajo control de imagen (ecografía o tomografía computarizada) o mediante toracoscopia. La pérdida de expresión de BAP1 o de MTAP (inmunohistoquímica) y la deleción homocigota de CDKN2A (hibridación fluorescente in situ) constituyen los marcadores moleculares básicos para el diagnóstico de mesotelioma. El tipo histológico y el estado funcional del paciente son los factores pronósticos más importantes. El control del derrame pleural se puede realizar a través de la inserción de catéteres pleurales tunelizados, bien como medida aislada (p. ej. pacientes no susceptibles de terapia multimodal que se han diagnosticado por citología del líquido pleural o biopsia guiada por imagen) o combinada con la administración de talco aerosolizado durante una toracoscopia diagnóstica. La inmunoterapia constituye una de las primeras líneas de tratamiento en pacientes inoperables, particularmente en las variedades histológicas bifásicas o sarcomatosas. (AU)


The diagnosis of diffuse pleural mesothelioma requires in most cases a pleural biopsy, performed either under imaging guidance (ultrasound or computed tomography) or thoracoscopy. Loss of BAP1 or MTAP expression (immunohistochemistry) and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A (fluorescence in situ hybridization) are the basic molecular markers for the diagnosis of mesothelioma. The histologic type and patient's performance status are the most important prognostic factors. Pleural effusion can be managed by the insertion of tunneled pleural catheters, either as a stand-alone measure (e.g., patients not amenable to multimodality therapy who have been diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology or image-guided biopsy) or combined with the administration of aerosolized talc during a diagnostic thoracoscopy. Immunotherapy is one of the front-line approaches in inoperable patients, particularly in biphasic or sarcomatous histologic varieties. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Homozigoto , Hibridização In Situ , Fluorescência , Neoplasias Pleurais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pleurais/genética , Neoplasias Pleurais/terapia , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma/genética , Mesotelioma/terapia , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase/genética , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase/metabolismo , Deleção de Sequência
8.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 100(11): 673-683, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35667609

RESUMO

This article summarizes the clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) sponsored by the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT). Ten clinical controversies were elaborated under the methodology of PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions and the quality of the evidence and grading of the strength of the recommendations was based on the GRADE system. Immunocytochemical and molecular analyses of pleural fluid may avoid further invasive diagnostic procedures. Currently, the definitive control of MPE can be achieved either by pleurodesis (talc poudrage or slurry) or the insertion of a indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). It is likely that the combination of both techniques (i.e., thoracoscopy with talc poudrage and insertion of a IPC, or instillation of talc slurry through a IPC) will have a predominant role in the future therapeutic management.


Assuntos
Derrame Pleural Maligno , Cirurgia Torácica , Humanos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/cirurgia , Derrame Pleural Maligno/tratamento farmacológico , Talco/uso terapêutico , Pleurodese/métodos , Cateteres de Demora
9.
Acta méd. colomb ; 47(2): 32-34, Apr.-June 2022. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1419921

RESUMO

Abstract Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine cancer. It generally has a good prognosis, with a 10-year survival rate of over 90%. Pleural metastasis is uncommon. We present two cases of papillary thyroid cancer with pleural metastases. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2022.2216).


Resumen El cáncer de tiroides es la neoplasia endocrinológica más común. Suele presentar un buen pro nóstico con una sobrevida a 10 años mayor al 90%. El compromiso metastásico pleural es poco frecuente. Presentamos dos casos de cáncer papilar de tiroides con compromiso pleural metastásico. (Acta Med Colomb 2022; 47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2022.2216).

10.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 159(5): 240-247, 2022 09 09.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35636988

RESUMO

The diagnosis of diffuse pleural mesothelioma requires in most cases a pleural biopsy, performed either under imaging guidance (ultrasound or computed tomography) or thoracoscopy. Loss of BAP1 or MTAP expression (immunohistochemistry) and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A (fluorescence in situ hybridization) are the basic molecular markers for the diagnosis of mesothelioma. The histologic type and patient's performance status are the most important prognostic factors. Pleural effusion can be managed by the insertion of tunneled pleural catheters, either as a stand-alone measure (e.g., patients not amenable to multimodality therapy who have been diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology or image-guided biopsy) or combined with the administration of aerosolized talc during a diagnostic thoracoscopy. Immunotherapy is one of the front-line approaches in inoperable patients, particularly in biphasic or sarcomatous histologic varieties.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma Maligno , Mesotelioma , Neoplasias Pleurais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Homozigoto , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma/genética , Mesotelioma/terapia , Neoplasias Pleurais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pleurais/genética , Neoplasias Pleurais/terapia , Deleção de Sequência , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/metabolismo , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase/genética , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase/metabolismo
11.
s.l; Cir. esp. (Internet, Engl. ed.); jul. 2, 2022.
Não convencional em Espanhol | BIGG - guias GRADE | ID: biblio-1379801

RESUMO

This article summarizes the clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) sponsored by the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT). Ten clinical controversies were elaborated under the methodology of PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions and the quality of the evidence and grading of the strength of the recommendations was based on the GRADE system. Immunocytochemical and molecular analyses of pleural fluid may avoid further invasive diagnostic procedures. Currently, the definitive control of MPE can be achieved either by pleurodesis (talc poudrage or slurry) or the insertion of a tunneled pleural catheter (TPC). It is likely that the combination of both techniques (i.e., thoracoscopy with talc poudrage and insertion of a TPC, or instillation of talc slurry through a TPC) will have a predominant role in the future therapeutic management.


Este artículo resume la guía clínica de diagnóstico y tratamiento del derrame pleural maligno (DPM) auspiciada por la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica (SECT). Se elaboraron 10 controversias clínicas bajo la metodología de preguntas PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) y la calidad de la evidencia y graduación de la fuerza de las recomendaciones se basó en el sistema Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). El análisis inmunocitoquímico y molecular del líquido pleural puede evitar procedimientos invasivos ulteriores con finalidad diagnóstica. Actualmente, el control definitivo del DPM se puede realizar indistintamente a través de una pleurodesis (talco poudrage o slurry) o de la inserción de un catéter pleural tunelizado (CPT). Es probable que la combinación de ambas técnicas (p.ej. toracoscopia con talco poudrage e inserción de un CPT, o instilación de talco slurry a través de un CPT) ocupe un lugar predominante en el manejo terapéutico futuro.


Assuntos
Humanos , Toracoscopia , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico por imagem , Pleurodese , Cirurgia Torácica/métodos , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/métodos
12.
Rev. colomb. cancerol ; 26(1): 14-21, ene.-mar. 2022. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1407968

RESUMO

Resumen Revisión narrativa sobre cómo el cáncer altera la fisiología de la pleura, cómo se estudia el derrame pleural maligno y cómo se puede brindar paliación al paciente con derrame pleural mediante el catéter pleural permanente tunelizado, cuyo uso demuestra mayores beneficios en diferentes ámbitos clínicos, siendo utilizado principalmente para el tratamiento del derrame pleural tumoral recurrente, pero también en algunos casos de derrame pleural benigno repetitivo, convirtiéndolo en un recurso terapéutico útil en el cáncer avanzado.


Abstract This narrative review examines how cancer causes changes in pleural physiology, how to study malignant pleural effusion, and how to bring palliative care to patients with pleural effusion by means of indwelling tunneled pleural catheter. This catheter shows greater benefits in clinical practice, being used mainly for the treatment of recurrent malignant pleural effusion, but also in some cases of recurrent benign pleural effusion, making it a useful therapeutic tool in advanced cancer.


Assuntos
Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Derrame Pleural , Derrame Pleural Maligno , Terapêutica , Cateteres
13.
J. bras. pneumol ; 48(5): e20220064, 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1394407

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the process of diagnosing patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients referred to a tertiary-care cancer center in Brazil between 2009 and 2020. The diagnostic process was divided into four steps: onset of symptoms, referral to a specialist visit, histopathological diagnosis, and beginning of treatment. The intervals between each phase and the factors for delays were evaluated. Data including clinical status, radiological examinations, staging, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were collected. Results: During the study period, 66 patients (mean age = 64 years) were diagnosed with MPM and underwent treatment. Only 27 (41%) of the patients had knowledge of prior exposure to asbestos. The median number of months (IQR) between the onset of symptoms and the first specialist visit, between the specialist visit and histopathological characterization, and between definite diagnosis and beginning of treatment was, respectively, 6.5 (2.0-11.4), 1.5 (0.6-2.1), and 1.7 (1.2-3.4). The knowledge of prior asbestos exposure was associated with a shorter time to referral to a specialist (median: 214 vs. 120 days; p = 0.04). A substantial number of nondiagnostic procedures and false-negative biopsy results (the majority of which involved the use of Cope needle biopsy) were found to be decisive factors for the length of waiting time. The mean overall survival was 11.9 months. Conclusions: The unfamiliarity of health professionals with MPM and the patient's lack of knowledge of prior asbestos exposure were the major factors to cause a long time interval between the onset of symptoms and beginning of treatment. An overall survival shorter than 1 year is likely to have been due to the aforementioned delays.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o processo de diagnóstico de pacientes com mesotelioma pleural maligno (MPM) em um hospital terciário. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo envolvendo pacientes encaminhados a um centro oncológico terciário no Brasil entre 2009 e 2020. O processo diagnóstico foi dividido em quatro etapas: início dos sintomas, encaminhamento para consulta especializada, diagnóstico histopatológico e início do tratamento. Foram avaliados os intervalos entre as etapas e os fatores de atraso. Os dados coletados incluíram estado clínico, exames radiológicos, estadiamento, modalidades de tratamento e resultados de sobrevida. Resultados: Durante o período do estudo, 66 pacientes (média de idade = 64 anos) foram diagnosticados com MPM e submetidos a tratamento. Apenas 27 (41%) dos pacientes tinham conhecimento de exposição prévia ao amianto. A mediana de meses (IIQ) entre o início dos sintomas e a primeira consulta especializada, entre a consulta especializada e a caracterização histopatológica e entre o diagnóstico definitivo e o início do tratamento foi, respectivamente, de 6,5 (2,0-11,4), 1,5 (0,6 -2,1) e 1,7 (1,2-3,4). Conhecimento de exposição prévia ao amianto associou-se a menor tempo para encaminhamento a um especialista (mediana: 214 vs. 120 dias; p = 0,04). O número substancial de procedimentos não diagnósticos e as biópsias falso-negativas (a maioria envolvendo o uso de biópsia com agulha de Cope) foram considerados fatores decisivos para o tempo de espera. A sobrevida global média foi de 11,9 meses. Conclusões: A falta de familiaridade dos profissionais de saúde com o MPM e o desconhecimento dos pacientes em relação à exposição prévia ao amianto foram os principais fatores que ocasionaram um longo intervalo de tempo entre o início dos sintomas e o início do tratamento. A sobrevida global inferior a 1 ano provavelmente se deve aos atrasos supracitados.

14.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed) ; 56(3): 143-148, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31253375

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pleural disease involves a large number of admissions and long hospital stays. In order to improve this situation, a Pleural Unit (PU) was created in our hospital. Our aim was to analyze the clinical impact of this unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we included patients admitted to the PU of the Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) between January 2015 and December 2018. We analyzed descriptive parameters, mean length of stay, readmissions at 1 month, need for surgery, and in the CPPE group, in-hospital mortality. The data were compared with those of patients admitted to the respiratory medicine department for the same diseases during the previous two years (2013-2014). We also describe all procedures performed in the PU, in both inpatients and outpatients. RESULTS: A total of 741 patients were included, We observed a progressive decrease in total admissions for pleural diseases and mean length of stay (days) (with the exception of MPE), as follows: PSP: from 6.2 to 4.2 (P=.004); SSP: 13.2 to 8.6 (P=.005), MPE: 10.3 to 12.3 (P=.05); and CPPE: 18.3 to 11.3 (P=.001) There was a reduction in hospital readmissions at 1 month and in in-hospital mortality due to CPPE in the PU period (14.9% to 5.5%) (P=.021). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a PU could decrease the number of unnecessary admissions, and reduce mean lengths of stay and, in the case of CPPE, in-hospital mortality.


Assuntos
Empiema Pleural , Hospitalização , Derrame Pleural , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Empiema Pleural/complicações , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pleura/patologia , Derrame Pleural/complicações , Derrame Pleural Maligno/complicações , Pneumotórax/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos
15.
Rev. venez. cir ; 72(2): 47-51, 2019. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1370637

RESUMO

Comparar el uso del talco estéril versus yodopovidona como agentes químicos en pleurodesis para el tratamiento del derrame pleural maligno.Materiales y Métodos: Estudio clínico, analítico, observacional, prospectivo, el cual incluyó 12 pacientes con diagnóstico clínico e histopatológico de derrame pleural maligno, a quienes se les practicó pleurodesis empleando talco estéril y yodopovidona.Resultados : Edad promedio fue de 46,25 ± 17,3 y la neoplasia primaria más común fue el cáncer de mama, representando el 50% de los casos estudiados. El grupo de pacientes tratados con yodopovidona tuvo 100% de efectividad en la fusión pleural posterior a la pleurodesis, y presentaron menos complicaciones durante el procedimiento y 24 horas posteriores al mismo con respecto al grupo tratado con talco estéril, el cual tuvo un 71,4% de efectividad y un 28,6% de falla al procedimiento; asimismo, estos últimos presentaron mayor porcentaje de complicaciones. Por otra parte, no se evidenció recidiva del derrame pleural en los 30 días de valoración posteriores al procedimiento. Estas diferencias no fueron estadísticamente significativas.Conclusiones : Ambos agentes esclerosantes fueron eficaces para lograr la fusión de las pleuras en pacientes con derrame pleural maligno, siendo el talco estéril el agente con mayor tendencia a producir complicaciones y fallo del procedimiento, en comparación a la yodopovidona(AU)


To compare the use of sterile talc versus povidone-iodine as chemical agents on pleurodesis for the treatment of malignant pleural effusion.Materials and Methods : A total of 12 patients with clinical and histopathologic diagnose of malignant pleural effusion were enrolled in a clinical, analytic, observational and prospective trial, to whom sterile talc and povidone-iodine pleurodesis was applied.Results : The mean age was 46,25 ± 17,3 and the most common primary neoplasm was breast cancer, which was present in 50% of the surveyed cases. The group of patients who received povidone-iodine had 100% of effectiveness on post-pleurodesis pleural fusion, and had fewer complications during the procedure and 24 hours afterwards vis-à-vis the group who received sterile talc powder, which had 74.4% of effectiveness and 28.6% of procedure failure; furthermore, the last mentioned had higher percentage of complications. Moreover, there was no evidence of recurrence of pleural effusion in the 30 days post-procedure assessment.Conclusions : Both sclerosant agents were efficient to accomplish pleural fusion in patients with malignant pleural effusion, with sterile talc being the agent with higher tendency to generate more complications and procedure failure compared to povidone-iodine(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Povidona-Iodo , Derrame Pleural Maligno/patologia , Pleurodese , Cirurgia Geral , Talco , Neoplasias da Mama , Diagnóstico Clínico , Esterilização
16.
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed) ; 54(6): 320-326, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29496288

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether changes in pleural fluid (PF) biochemistries between two consecutive thoracenteses enable clinicians to predict malignant or benign pleural effusions (PE). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with lymphocytic exudates and negative PF cytology, who underwent a second thoracentesis in our center in the last 15 years in whom a final diagnosis was reached (derivation sample). Absolute (Δa) and percentage differences (Δp) in PF biochemistries which predicted a malignant or benign PE in the derivation sample were evaluated in an independent population (validation sample). RESULTS: The derivation sample included 214 PE patients (70 malignant and 144 benign PE). Δp lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >0%, Δp neutrophils >-10% (any increase or less than 10% decrease) and Δa protein <0.1g/dL (any increase or less than 0.1g/dL decrease) between the second and the first thoracentesis had an odds ratio of 6.4, 3.9 and 2.1, respectively, to discriminate malignant from benign PE. The presence of the three conditions together had a positive likelihood ratio of 5.6, whereas the absence of any of the 3 parameters had a likelihood ratio of 0.04 for predicting malignancy. These results were reproduced in the validation sample. CONCLUSION: An increase in LDH and neutrophils along with a decrease in protein in a second thoracentesis increase the probability of malignant PE, while the opposite reduces it significantly.


Assuntos
Líquidos Corporais/química , Derrame Pleural/diagnóstico , Toracentese , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , L-Lactato Desidrogenase/análise , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/diagnóstico , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
J. bras. pneumol ; 43(6): 424-430, Nov.-Dec. 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-893883

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.


RESUMEN Objetivo: Estudios previos demuestran que la biopsia pleural cerrada (BPC) para diagnóstico de malignidad tiene una sensibilidad menor al 60%, por lo que recientemente ha despertado controversia su valor como prueba diagnóstica. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la exactitud de la BPC para diagnóstico de malignidad en pacientes con derrame pleural. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de 8 años en individuos que se sometieron a la realización de BPC para establecer la etiología del derrame. La información de cada paciente se tomó de los registros de anatomopatología y del expediente clínico. Cuando el resultado de la BPC demostró malignidad o tuberculosis, esto se tomó como biopsia diagnóstica y quedó éste como diagnóstico definitivo. En los casos en que el resultado del estudio histopatológico de la biopsia resultó inespecífico, el diagnóstico definitivo se estableció en base a otros procedimientos diagnósticos, como toracoscopia, toracotomía, fibrobroncoscopia, estudio bioquímico y celular del líquido pleural y/o pruebas microbiológicas. Mediante una tabla de contingencia de 2 × 2 se midieron los indicadores para una prueba diagnóstica. Resultados: Se estudiaron 1034 biopsias de pacientes con derrame pleural, de las cuales se excluyeron 171 (16.54%) por muestra inadecuada o información insuficiente. El desempeño para malignidad fue: sensibilidad, 77%; especificidad, 98%; valores predictivos positivo y negativo, 99% y 66%, respectivamente; índices de probabilidad positivo y negativo, 38.5 y 0.23, respectivamente; probabilidad antes y después de la prueba, 2.13 y 82, respectivamente. Conclusión: La BPC es útil como prueba diagnóstica en la práctica clínica, debido a que produce un cambio importante de la probabilidad antes de la prueba a la probabilidad después de la prueba.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biópsia/classificação , Biópsia/métodos , Derrame Pleural Maligno/patologia , Pleura/patologia , Toracoscopia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
18.
J. bras. pneumol ; 43(3): 190-194, May-June 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-893840

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the role of intrapleural positioning of a pleural catheter in early lung expansion and pleurodesis success in patients with recurrent malignant pleural effusion (RMPE). Methods: This was a retrospective study nested into a larger prospective cohort study including patients with RMPE recruited from a tertiary university teaching hospital between June of 2009 and September of 2014. The patients underwent pleural catheter insertion followed by bedside pleurodesis. Chest CT scans were performed twice: immediately before pleurodesis (iCT) and 30 days after pleurodesis (CT30). Catheter positioning was categorized based on iCT scans as posterolateral, anterior, fissural, and subpulmonary. We used the pleural volume on iCT scans to estimate early lung expansion and the difference between the pleural volumes on CT30 and iCT scans to evaluate radiological success of pleurodesis. Clinical pleurodesis success was defined as no need for any other pleural procedure. Results: Of the 131 eligible patients from the original study, 85 were included in this nested study (64 women; mean age: 60.74 years). Catheter tip positioning was subpulmonary in 35 patients (41%), anterior in 23 (27%), posterolateral in 17 (20%), and fissural in 10 (12%). No significant differences were found among the groups regarding early lung expansion (median residual pleural cavity = 377 mL; interquartile range: 171-722 mL; p = 0.645), radiological success of pleurodesis (median volume = 33 mL; interquartile range: −225 to 257 mL; p = 0.923), and clinical success of pleurodesis (85.8%; p = 0.676). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the position of the tip of the pleural catheter influences neither early lung expansion nor bedside pleurodesis success in patients with RMPE.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o papel do posicionamento intrapleural do cateter pleural na expansão pulmonar precoce e no sucesso da pleurodese em pacientes com derrame pleural maligno recorrente (DPMR). Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo aninhado em um estudo prospectivo de coorte maior com pacientes com DPMR recrutados em um hospital-escola universitário terciário entre junho de 2009 e setembro de 2014. Os pacientes foram submetidos a inserção de cateter pleural e, em seguida, pleurodese à beira do leito. A TC de tórax foi realizada duas vezes: imediatamente antes da pleurodese (TCi) e 30 dias após a pleurodese (TC30). Com base na TCi, a posição do cateter foi classificada em posterolateral, anterior, fissural e subpulmonar. Usamos o volume pleural na TCi para estimar a expansão pulmonar precoce e a diferença entre os volumes pleurais na TC30 e na TCi a fim de avaliar o sucesso radiológico da pleurodese. Considerou-se que a pleurodese teve êxito clínico quando não foi necessário realizar nenhum outro procedimento pleural. Resultados: Dos 131 pacientes elegíveis do estudo original, 85 foram incluídos neste estudo aninhado (64 mulheres; média de idade: 60,74 anos). A posição da ponta do cateter foi subpulmonar em 35 pacientes (41%), anterior em 23 (27%), posterolateral em 17 (20%) e fissural em 10 (12%). Não houve diferenças significativas entre os grupos quanto à expansão pulmonar precoce (mediana da cavidade pleural residual = 377 ml; intervalo interquartil: 171-722 ml; p = 0,645), sucesso radiológico da pleurodese (mediana do volume = 33 ml; intervalo interquartil: −225 a 257 ml; p = 0,923) e sucesso clínico da pleurodese (85,8%; p = 0,676). Conclusões: Nossos resultados sugerem que a posição da ponta do cateter pleural não influencia nem a expansão pulmonar precoce nem o sucesso da pleurodese à beira do leito em pacientes com DPMR.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Cateteres de Demora , Derrame Pleural Maligno/cirurgia , Pleurodese/métodos , Toracentese/instrumentação , Toracentese/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Cavidade Pleural/cirurgia , Pleura/patologia , Pleura/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 217(7): 423-426, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28433200

RESUMO

In most cases, the etiological diagnosis of pleural exudates does not require a pleural biopsy. However, when it is considered necessary, the biopsy should seldom be conducted using invasive methods such as thoracoscopy. Two paradigmatic examples are pleural tuberculosis and malignant effusions. In many centres, pleural fluid adenosine deaminase measurement has replaced closed pleural biopsies in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Similarly, pathological and molecular studies on pleural fluid cell blocks or alternatively, image-guided pleural biopsies have drastically reduced the need for thoracoscopy.

20.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 217(7): 420-422, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28410823

RESUMO

Pleural biopsies are especially indicated in the following circumstances: a) inconclusive pleural fluid analysis and negative sputum study, if adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels are unavailable; b) suspected multi-resistant tuberculosis; c) a need for differentiating tuberculous pleurisy (if it progresses with neutrophilia) and complicated parapneumonic effusion; d) malignant pleural effusion coexisting with very high ADA levels; e) effusion coexisting with lung cancer and negative pleural cytology; f) suspected mesothelioma; and g) need for implementing re-treatment for patients with relapse after chemotherapy. Image-guided needle biopsy is recommended for cases a and b, while thoracoscopy is preferable for the other cases.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...